About EM Sky      Bookshelves      Newsletter      Straight from the Barrel...
photo of river valley with farms
EM Sky: Straight from the Barrel...

Win Free Books!

Free NewsletterSubscribe to Wet Ink...
for exclusive offers
and monthly chances
to win free books!

Sponsored by...

September Releases

The Guild of XenolinguistsThe Guild of Xenolinguistsby Sheila Finch
Released Sept. 1!
PowersPowersby Ursula K. Le Guin
Released Sept. 1!
The Spiral LabyrinthThe Spiral Labyrinthby Matthew Hughes
Released Sept. 1!
Moon FlightsMoon Flightsby Elizabteh Moon
Released Sept. 1!
Now and ForeverNow and Foreverby Ray Bradbury
Released Sept. 4!
Heroes in TrainingHeroes in Trainingedited by
Martin H. Greenberg
and Jim C. Hines
Released Sept. 4!
Little (Grrl) LostLittle (Grrl) Lostby Charles de Lint
Released Sept. 6!
AxisAxisby Robert Charles Wilson
Released Sept. 18!
Invasive ProceduresInvasive Proceduresby Orson Scott Card
and Aaron Johnston
Released Sept. 18!
Making MoneyMaking Moneyby Terry Pratchett
Released Sept. 18!
The Orc KingThe Orc King
by R. A. Salvatore
Released Sept. 25!
AscendanciesAscendanciesby Bruce Sterling
Released Sept. 25!
Leven Thumps and the Eyes of the WantLeven Thumps and
the Eyes of the Want
by Obert Skye
Released Sept. 25!
The Winds of Marble ArchThe Winds
of Marble Arch
by Connie Willis
Released Sept. 25!
Sorcery and the Single GirlSorcery and the Single Girlby Mindy Klasky
Released Oct. 1!

Subscribe

 Get the feed

My AOL
Bloglines
Add to Google
Netvibes
Newsgator
Pageflakes
Rojo
My Yahoo
 Get it by e-mail

Add to Technorati Favorites
Copyright Notice

© Copyright EM Sky 2006-2007
Powered by
Movable Type 4.0

« The nature of a life mission - Part II | Main | The broad scope of a life mission »

Mathematical interlude - question the familiar

Announcing Win-Win Web's 100th post!

Ok, ok, it's "really" the 49th post, but I'm in a base 7 mood today.

For those of you who aren't engineers or computer scientists or mathematicians, that's a little math humor for you, offered up to illustrate a point. (The point's worth it, I promise.) Allow me to explain...

We generally use ten digits for counting: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Everybody knows that. "Normal" math is said to be in "base 10" because we make numbers by counting through these ten digits, then adding a digit to the left and starting over again. This process is so familiar that we never really think about it. It's just "how counting goes."

    0,   1,     2,     3,     4,   5,     6,     7,    8,    9, --> 10
  30,  31,   32,   33,   34,  35,   36,   37,  38,   39, --> 40
520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, --> 530

But you don't have to use ten digits for counting. You can use two digits or five digits or sixteen digits or as many as you want, just as long as you keep cycling through them in the same kind of pattern.

For a short example, let's say you want to count in base 3. That gives you three digits to work with: 0, 1, and 2. So you start at zero (0), then you count one thing (1), then you count a second thing (2), and already you're out of counting room because you've run out of digits! So just like in base ten, you make more room by moving the "high" digit (in this case, 2) back to zero and adding one to the left.

0, 1, 2, --> 10

So you go from "2" to "10" (don't think "ten", think "one, zero") - and that's three. Now you can go from 10 to 11 (for four things) and from 11 to 12 (for five things), and you can see that the right-hand digit is up to 2 again.

10, 11, 12, --> 20

The pattern may be easier to see in the chart below. (To see it even more easily, when you see a number like 12 or 110 on the chart, don't think "twelve" or "one hundred and ten," think "one-two" or "one-one-zero.")

base 10    "actual" number     base three
0 ---------------  zero ----------------- 0 (zero)
1 ---------------  one  ----------------- 1 (one)
2 ---------------  two  ----------------- 2 (two)
3 ---------------  three  -------------- 10 (one, zero)
4 ---------------  four  --------------- 11 (one, one)
5 ---------------  five  --------------- 12 (one, two)
6 ---------------  six  ----------------- 20 (two, zero)
7 ---------------  seven  -------------- 21 (two, one)
8 ---------------  eight  --------------- 22 (two, two)
9 ---------------  nine  --------------- 100 (one, zero, zero)
10 --------------  ten  ---------------- 101 (one, zero, one)
11 --------------  eleven  ------------ 102 (one, zero, two)
12 --------------  twelve  ------------ 110 (one, one, zero)
13 --------------  thirteen  ---------- 111 (one, one, one)

You see? In base three, whenever you get through all three digits (0, 1, 2) you have to start back around at zero again, just like you have to do in base ten whenever you get through all ten digits. Simple enough.*

And now we're getting to the joke. Notice that in base three, "100" is nine, which is three times three. And in base ten ("normal" math), "100" is one hundred, which is ten times ten. Whatever base you're working in, "100" is always that base times itself.**

Here's a small chart of what "100" stands for in a few different base systems, translated into "normal" math:

"100" in base 2 (2 X 2) is 4.
"100" in base 3 (3 X 3) is 9.
"100" in base 4 (4 X 4) is 16.
"100" in base 5 (5 X 5) is 25.
"100" in base 6 (6 X 6) is 36.
"100" in base 7 (7 X 7) is 49.

So there's the joke. In base 7, the number forty-nine is written "100." So the 49th post is the "100th" post if you're counting in base 7. (Hey, I said it was a little math humor. I never said it was hilarious...)

So what was all this math talk supposed to illustrate? There are many, many things we do every day that we never think about. We don't have to do them the way we do. It just feels like the only way to do them. It feels like the "real" way because that's how we've always done these things - because that's how everyone does them. But the way we do things isn't necessarily the best way to do them. It's just what's familiar.

"100" doesn't have to stand for one hundred. That's nothing more than a convention. We use base ten out of habit. Originally we probably chose to base our math system on ten digits because we have ten fingers. But we could just as easily have used base three or base five or base seven. (Base five could have been a natural choice, since we have five fingers on each hand.)***

This problem of the familiar is worth keeping in mind when we look around at how we do just about everything. For example... Do people really have better ideas when they're wearing business suits than they do when they're wearing blue jeans? Does the name on the label of your favorite pair of blue jeans really reflect your personality? Does a school "uniform" that allows children to wear different brand names really eliminate the awareness of social "class"? Does a person's level of "class" really have anything to do with their level of income?

Most of the "thinking" that we do every day isn't really active thinking. It's just popular (and familiar) programming that goes streaming through our minds unquestioned. We make assumptions about other people based on all kinds of social cues that have few, if any, ties to reality. We make assumptions about the appropriateness of policies based on "common sense" that may be more common than logical.

The list goes on and on and on... As difficult as it is, try not to assume in life that "familiar" is the same thing as "necessary." Look around. Question everything. Just because "it's the way everybody does it" doesn't mean it's the best way. Every parent tries time and again to teach this to their children. ("If your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do it?") It's time we remembered it for ourselves.

----------------------------------------------------

*You might have noticed that "10" is how you write the number ten in base ten and it's also how you write the number three in base three. That always happens because you always have to roll over to 10 (one, zero) when you run out of single digits. So "10" is also how you write five in base five, and seven in base seven, and sixteen in base sixteen. That's how it works.

**Technically, that's because when you get to "100" you've run out of that many digits that many times. Look at the base three chart above - when you get to "100" in base three, you've gone through all three digits three times.

***Just to blow your mind a little more, if we did use any of those bases, then in each case that's what we would be calling "base 10" - because "10" is three in base three, and five in base five, and seven in base seven. If we all used base three math, for example, then base three math would be called "base 10 math" -  and everyone would think that was "real" math and that 22 things was "really" this many: ||||||||. And then base ten math would be called "base 101 math" (because ten is represented as "101" in base three - see the chart above), and everyone would think that wasn't "real" math because they would think there weren't "really" enough digits for base 101 math since everyone would know that zero, one, and two were the only "real" digits and the rest were just "made up" by mathematicians. Strange, huh?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mindunbound.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/emsky/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/47

Comments (6)

Kel:

Some computer nerds are particularly fond of "hexadecimal" or base 16 numbers. It's especially useful for tracking your age - I'm only 32 in hexadecimal :-)

Like you said, a little bit of math humour.

Kel -

I love it!

I'm 24 in hexadecimal, which makes you E years older than I am... (I guess that bit loses something in the translation.) ;)

- EM

Kel:

Hi EM,

It has also been said that there are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Kel

Ok, I can't resist. Have you heard this one? What do you get when you cross an elephant with a banana?

Kel:

I give up, what ?

(elephant)(banana)sin(theta)

HA! (Ok, that's a joke about vector math, having nothing to do with different bases, but I think we've opened the proverbial can of worms. I admit it - I love obscure math jokes.)

- EM

Post a comment

Mind Unbound: toward the unimagined truth (SM)